|
61 |
DOSEL/R/T/20/00114/4 |
nil |
Detailed expenditure incurred items wise, school wise and state wise in interaction of PM on the eve of Teachers Day celebration on 5th Sept. 2014. |
30-01-2020 |
nil |
In respect of Teachers Day and Pariksha Pe Charcha, no such information is available. |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
62 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00209 |
nil |
Sub- Details of submissions for objective criteria of NAT(national teachers award)-CBSE secondary 18 teachers -2015 list attached showing detailed information points 2,7,8 -needing disclosure in wide public interest under section 8(2) of RTI act
Ref- Objective criteria point-2,7,8 (2- Publication (Research papers/Articles in international/national journals with ISSN, Books with ISBN etc.) in the last 5 years, 7. Whether the teacher is enrolled for any course under SWAYAM or any other MOOCS platform 8. Development of e-contents, textbooks, teacher handbooks for SCERTs, Boards or NCERT)
(1) Pdf copy of detailed sheet of objective criteria showing detailed list of submission of objective criteria point 2,7,8 publications, development of e-contents, MOOC courses of awarded teachers of aforesaid 18 CBSE secondary teachers awarded in 2015
(2) If 1 is not available, copy of procedure adopted for finalizing awards without any publication,development of e-contents of awarded teachers in the last five years
(3) Pdf copy of list of awarded teachers showing 404 error on the website
(4) Copy of decision taken for removal of list of awarded teachers from the website as in (3)
(5) If pdf copy not compiled, copy of exemption given under section 4(1)(a) from digitizing, indexing ,cataloging records since 2005 in last 14 years by competent authority
(6) Kindly provide information pointwise by complying para-12,13 of DoPT GUIDE for CPIO(2008)-attached without directing me to visit website without giving specific url |
25-01-2020 |
nil |
Please see attachment |
View
|
DOSEL/A/E/20/00101 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00209
First Appeal with condonation of delay due to covid-19
(1) Q-1, 2 Learned CPIO have not cited total amount to be deposited nor generated payment link on the rtionline portal for the actual objective criteria submitted of awarded CBSE secondary teachers of 2015. FAA is requested to direct learned CPIO to please generate link on the rtionline portal in view of covid-19 ( to avoid IPO use).
(2) Q-3 till date , no such list is available as declared by learned CPO nor any url /pdf given by learned CPIO .
(3) Q-4 No relevant reply by learned CPIO about removal of list showing 404 error (due to removal from the website).
(4) RBI vs Kishanlal Mittal in W.P.(C) 1388/2012 of Delhi highcourt para-9 mandates detailed reasons of FAA in deciding first appeal - When the order passed by the First Appellate Authority is challenged before the Commission, it is required to deal, at least briefly with the reasons given by the First Appellate Authority in support of its decision. Similarly, in the event of the order being challenged before a Writ Court the said Court would not be in a position to know what were the reasons which impelled the Commission to set aside the order passed by the First Appellate Authority. The order of the Commission must necessarily disclose at least brief reasons for disagreeing the view taken by the First Appellate Authority, and setting aside the order.
(5) Kindly deliver pointwise speaking order of STILL PENDING Q-1 to 4 with opportunity to me to submit my view in real time during telephonic hearing in COVID-19 as per principles of natural justice as mandated in the RTI act, DoPT Guide for FAA-OM No.l/3/2008-IR dated 25th April, 2008 esp. para-38,41
(6) Kindly consider three supreme court judgments for disposal necessitating detailed reasons pointwise by conducting quasi-judicial hearings by executives attached. One more important judgment of supreme court of Namit Sharma v/s Union of India in Writ Petition (CIVIL) NO. 210 of 2012 wherein it was held as follows-In keeping with the principles of natural justice it is binding upon a First Appellate Authority to a grant of hearing to a RTI Appellant.
(7) Kindly specifically cite (HITHERTO IGNORED IN ALL PREVIOUS APPEALS) grounds 5,6 of this appeal in the decision emphasizing Quasi-judicial procedure for first appeal decision laid down by supreme court as well as DoPT guide for FAA (2008)
(8) In section 19(5), In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, who denied the request. SO FAA IS REQUESTED TO CONDUCT APPEAL PROCEEDING BY CONDUCTING TELEPHONIC HEARING TO DECIDE JUSTIFICATION OF CPIO IN DENYING THE REQUEST (CPIO IS BOUND TO PROVE DENIAL IN FIRST AND SECOND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN PRESENCE OF APPLICANT).
|
2020-06-22 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
63 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00210 |
nil |
Sub- Details of background papers for initiation of NAT(national award for teachers) necessitating self nomination by aspirant teachers, keeping very low weightage of CATEGORY-A-OBJECTIVE CRITERIA TO BE MERELY 20 PERCENT in ultra vires manner and related details needing disclosure in wider public interest under section 8(2)-copy of objective and performance criteria with breakup of marks attached
Ref-keeping objective criteria so low is equivalent to keeping written marks to be merely 20 percent and interview marks 80 percent against supreme court judgments of keeping interview marks lower than 15 percent resulting in favoritism and against natural principles of justice
(1) Pdf copy of background papers for initiation of NAT necessitating self nomination (such self nomination is against natural principles by concentrating more on award than at actual work)
(2) Pdf copy of notesheets for approval of procedure of self nomination by teacher himself hunting for award by getting distracted from teaching work
(3) Pdf copy of agenda,proceeding, finalizing criteria of reduction of objective criteria of evaluation to be merely 20 percent and unduly increasing performance criteria to excessively high upto 80 percent (motivating undeserving teachers to win the award by manipulation and the best deserving teachers in the dark by having objective criteria to be mere 20 percent)-such information needing disclosure in wide public interest under section 8(2) , 7(9)
(4) Pdf copy of further break up of 8 points in the objective criteria of NAT esp. point-2,7,8 (2- Publication (Research papers/Articles in international/national journals with ISSN, Books with ISBN etc.) in the last 5 years, 7. Whether the teacher is enrolled for any course under SWAYAM or any other MOOCS platform
8. Development of e-contents, textbooks, teacher handbooks for SCERTs, Boards or NCERT)
(5) Pdf copy of CAG performance audit remarks made in the last five years over such vague criteria adopted by keeping objective criteria weightage very very low to 20 percent
(6) If pdf copy not compiled, copy of exemption given under section 4(1)(a) from digitizing, indexing ,cataloging records since 2005 in last 14 years by competent authority
(7) Kindly provide information pointwise by complying para-12,13 of DoPT GUIDE for CPIO(2008)-attached without directing me to visit website without giving specific url |
25-01-2020 |
nil |
Please find attachment |
View
|
DOSEL/A/E/20/00102 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00210
First Appeal with condonation of delay due to covid-19
(1) Q-1, 3 to 5 Learned CPIO have not given my desired information of prevailing practice of wide public interest in view of merely 20 percent weightage for objective criteria . Such information needs disclosure under section 8(2) in wide public interest. FAA should provide this information.
(2) Q-2 no notesheets were attached as cited in the reply.
(3) Q- 3 to 5 learned CPIO have declared revised criteria since 2018 whereas my query is long prevailing practice having objective criteria evaluation to be mere 20 percent.
(4) RBI vs Kishanlal Mittal in W.P.(C) 1388/2012 of Delhi highcourt para-9 mandates detailed reasons of FAA in deciding first appeal - When the order passed by the First Appellate Authority is challenged before the Commission, it is required to deal, at least briefly with the reasons given by the First Appellate Authority in support of its decision. Similarly, in the event of the order being challenged before a Writ Court the said Court would not be in a position to know what were the reasons which impelled the Commission to set aside the order passed by the First Appellate Authority. The order of the Commission must necessarily disclose at least brief reasons for disagreeing the view taken by the First Appellate Authority, and setting aside the order.
(5) Kindly deliver pointwise speaking order of STILL PENDING Q-1 to 5 with opportunity to me to submit my view in real time during telephonic hearing in COVID-19 as per principles of natural justice as mandated in the RTI act, DoPT Guide for FAA-OM No.l/3/2008-IR dated 25th April, 2008 esp. para-38,41
(6) Kindly consider three supreme court judgments for disposal necessitating detailed reasons pointwise by conducting quasi-judicial hearings by executives attached. One more important judgment of supreme court of Namit Sharma v/s Union of India in Writ Petition (CIVIL) NO. 210 of 2012 wherein it was held as follows-In keeping with the principles of natural justice it is binding upon a First Appellate Authority to a grant of hearing to a RTI Appellant.
(7) Kindly specifically cite (HITHERTO IGNORED IN ALL PREVIOUS APPEALS) grounds 5,6 of this appeal in the decision emphasizing Quasi-judicial procedure for first appeal decision laid down by supreme court as well as DoPT guide for FAA (2008)
(8) In section 19(5), In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, who denied the request. SO FAA IS REQUESTED TO CONDUCT APPEAL PROCEEDING BY CONDUCTING TELEPHONIC HEARING TO DECIDE JUSTIFICATION OF CPIO IN DENYING THE REQUEST (CPIO IS BOUND TO PROVE DENIAL IN FIRST AND SECOND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN PRESENCE OF APPLICANT).
|
2020-06-22 |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
64 |
DOSEL/R/T/20/00057/1 |
nil |
1- How to many proposal(ONLINE/OFFLINE)of Seminar/Workshop/Conference/National Awards passed from your HRD ministry Govt.of India.
2-Provide all Seminar/Workshop/Conference/National Awards proposal(ONLINE/OFFLINE) copy.
3-Provide any proposal (ONLINE/OFFLINE) hard copy who passed filling by any NGO who passed by your department.
4-How much proposal (ONLINE/OFFLINE) of DIGITAL LITERACY passed from your HRD ministry Govt.of India. provide any passed proposal hard copy who passed by your ministry.
5-How Many proposal Adult Education and Skill Development who fill by NGO accepted by your department. provided me one-one proposal copy who accepted by your Department. |
15-01-2020 |
nil |
In so far as NAT Section is concerned a total number of 5200 applicants had submitted online self-nominations from all States,UTs,Organization for the year 2019. Out of which 154 teachers were called for presentation before Independent Jury at National Level on 13th, 16th and 17th August 2019. Finally 46 teachers were selected by Independent Jury at National Level who were conferred National Award to Teachers on 05.09.2019 by the Honorable President of India. |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
65 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00026/1 |
nil |
1) Is Aadhaar number mandatory for the purpose of admission in school/college.
2) If the answer of the above question is affirmative, has the Authority issued any directions for the said purpose. Kindly furnish a copy of the same.
3) Please provide the certified copy of the permission to access Aadhaar database given by UIDAI. |
03-01-2020 |
nil |
Information sought under RTI Act, 2005 |
View
|
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
66 |
DOSEL/R/E/20/00027/1 |
nil |
1) Is Aadhaar number mandatory for the purpose of admission in school/college.
2) If the answer of the above question is affirmative, has the Authority issued any directions for the said purpose. Kindly furnish a copy of the same.
3) Please provide the certified copy of the permission to access Aadhaar database given by UIDAI.
4) Is aadhar number mandatory for teachers attendance on UDISE AND SALAKOSH. |
03-01-2020 |
nil |
Information sought under RTI Act, 2005 |
View
|
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
67 |
DOSEL/R/2019/53263/4 |
nil |
Dear CPIO
Kindly provide following schemes of your department--
1. Total Budget Allocation for 2019-20 for the schemes Samagra Shiksha, Mid Day Meal, National Litracy Mission, Saakshar Bharat, National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme, National Scheme for Incentives to Girls for Secondary Education, Scheme for Providing Education in Madarsas, and Program for International Student Assessment.
2. Total money spent till date of response of this application from the Budget Allocation for 2019-20 for the schemes Samagra Shiksha, Mid Day Meal, National Literacy Mission, Saakshar Bharat, National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme, National Scheme for Incentives to Girls for Secondary Education, Scheme for Providing Education in Madarsas, and Program for International Student Assessment.
With regards
Shyamlal Yadav |
12-12-2019 |
nil |
Letter attached |
View
|
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
68 |
DOSEL/R/2019/53043 |
nil |
Please find attachment |
16-11-2019 |
View
|
Information has been provided as attachment |
View
|
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
69 |
DOSEL/R/2019/53020/1 |
nil |
I would like to request you to please provide me the information on the following:
1) State wise literacy rate of all the states in INDIA
2) Number of state and central state government schools in each state of INDIA, also mentioning the medium of teaching( english or any other) along with the number in each state
3) Student fee in all the government schools. |
13-11-2019 |
nil |
Information provided as attachment |
View
|
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
|
70 |
DOSEL/R/2019/81035 |
nil |
Dear authority kindly provide the below required information for state of rajasthan only
1. List of teachers who received national award during years 1996 to 2003. Mentioning their names and age (if available) for state of rajasthan only. |
22-10-2019 |
nil |
The National Award to Teachers Section maintains records for the last 5 years only. Therefore, information about list of awardee teachers during the year 1996 to 2003 of Rajasthan State is not available with the NAT Section. |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |