sno:
332
Undefined
Requestreg No:
DOHED/R/2015/61865
Request:
To, Central Public Information Officer, MHRD, New Delhi. Dated:-. June 9, 2015 Subject: - Application under RTI-2005 Act. Dear Sir, I request you to provide answers to the following queries under RTI-2005 Act. The application is to seek information regarding letter ( F.No. 28-5/2012-TS-I, Govt. of India, MHRD, Deptt. Of Higher Education, Technical section-I) dated 26th November 2013, issued by Mr Alok Mishra (Director IIITs) to Director of IIITDand M Kancheepuram with Subject :- Career Advancement scheme (CAS) clarification-reg. The above said letter was put before the honble HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS, in the case W.A.Nos.2187 and 2188 of 2013. In the said case the honble court said:- respondent in his clarification letter dated 26.11.2013 has clearly stated that there is no provision for automatic movement or upgradation to higher grade merely on completion of certain years of service and it has to be done only on the recommendation of a duly constituted selection committee The above said letter(26.11.2013) was presented before the honble high court as further explanation to para 3(ii) of MHRD directive (No.3-2712009-TS.11 Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource, Development ,Department of Higher Education, Technical Section-I1, New Delhi, 3oth December, 2009). The directive dated 30.12.2009 was issued as a part of pay commission recommendations for CFTIs. To RTI application dated 11.10.2014 filed by Mrs R. Rithika from Chennai. In the reply (dated 22nd Oct. 2014) CPIO of MHRD stated that for the implementation of para 3(ii) of above said MHRD directive(dated 30.12.2009), it was never modified/clarified so as to insist for interview/selection committee. Please provide the following information:- 1.Please quote the rule under which Mr Alok Mishra (holding post of director at MHRD) issued the above said letter dated 26.11.2013, which amounted to amendment on his own a document issued as part of pay commission recommendation. Regards, (Subir Singh Lamba) Flat no. 516, Rajul Parkview, Mandla Road, Tilhari, Jabalpur-482020.
Request Recvd Date:
09/06/2015
Request Reply:
Reply attached.
Appealreg No:
DOHED/A/2015/60373
Appeal:
To, Date: June 24, 2015 Appellate Authority, PDPM IIITDM , Jabalpur. Sub.: Filing the first appeal/complaint against the CPIO under section 19 of the RTI act. 1.Details of Appellant a.Name:- Subir Singh Lamba b.Address:- Flat No. 516, Rajul Parkview, Tilhari, Mandla Road, Jabalpur. 482020 2.Details of Public Information Officer: a.Name:- Mr. Praveer Saxena 3.Details of RTI application to Central Public Information Officer: a.Application Filed online on:- 09/6/2015 b.Application received by CPIO on:- 11/06/2015 c.Reply by CPIO dated 16/6/2015 4.Particulars of payment of filing fee: a.Paid electronically Rs.10/- . Dear Sir, I would like to file a complaint against information provided by CPIO of MHRD Mr Praveer Saxena to a RTI application dated 09.06.2015. Through my RTI application I sought information to only one query. The CPIO in his reply has stated that The requisite information sought by you is not available with the undersigned. Precise information is not provided, the reply is vague. The reply can be interpreted by me as :- 1.That, Mr Alok Mishra transgressed his power in issuance of letter dated 26th November 2013. 2.That, without any rule/assigned power, Mr Alok Mishra issued the letter dated 26th November 2013. And, thereby on his own amended MHRD directive dated 30.12.2009. I request you to please provide me the required information or confirm my above conclusion as the reply is completely vague. Under RTI act precise information has to be provided. Also, take appropriate action on the CPIO for providing vague information. Regards, (Subir Singh Lamba)
Appeal Recvd Date:
24/06/2015
Appeal Doc URL:
Appeal Reply:
Reply attached.
