3141 |
DOHED/R/2015/63500/1 |
nil |
In reference to letter no. F. NO.17-2/2014-TS.I, Govt. of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, I want following detailed information under RTI act (2005) regarding:- 1. The rules for applicability of revised scholarship on UGC affiliated Deemed universities, which are not centrally funded and categorised by department of higher education. 2. Difference between Full time PhD scholars, JRF and SRF in terms of scholarships. 3. Actions that can be taken against any UGC affiliated universities for not following the Norms. I do hereby declare that I am a citizen of India. I request you to ensure that the information is provided before the expiry of the 30 days period after you have received the application. |
12/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3142 |
DOHED/R/2015/63493 |
nil |
My city Raichur (Somalia of Karnataka) was the option for IIT in Karnataka from a various committees. Now MHRD has declared Dharward as its destination. I would like to know on what parameters the assessment was done and what are the parameter Raichur achieved and what is the gap between Raichur and Dharward. I am not complaining Why Dharward I would like to know Why not Raichur Raichur is very underdeveloped place. I am sorry to say that it is as good as Somalia of Karnataka. And the People from various sects (Politics) claim that they have made continuous and hard efforts to get IIT to Dharward. I would like to know that were our Higher Education Department officials were in pressure to make such decision. I have great respect on our officials. But I still want to know as a fellow citizen of Raichur (Somalia of Karnataka) as why not Raichur. (Somalia of Karnataka) Regards, |
12/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3143 |
DOHED/R/2015/63462 |
nil |
Respected sir, My name is shaik mabu hussain(student id:1-2430917557),studying m.tech,EEE(2014-2016) in JNTUA anantapur college of engineering( college id:1-448409851) through GATE entrance test in post graduation(technical).As per the revised fellowships for gate m.tech notification issued on 18-02-2015,.We are eligible for the revised fellowship.but we are getting only 8000 rupees but they not giving 12400 rupees as per the notification no F.N0.17-2/2014-TS.I, Government of India,Ministry of Human Resource Development,Department of Higher Education,Technical Section.But clearly stated in notification, The revision in emoluments comes into effect from 01.02.2015 for all categories of JRF/SRF/M.E./M.Tech/ MS/M.Des. In the represent of all our college students, we requesting to know about the reasons behind the not getting revised fellowship(pg stipend) of 12400 rupees.is it we get the scholarship or not, please mention the reasons . |
10/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3144 |
DOHED/R/2015/81011/2 |
nil |
Pls. advice the exact rules of caste based backward reservation and till when it was to be implemented as it was for only 10 years. Secondly,pls confirm: 1. How many Students got the benefit from such backward reservation quota till date and how many of them got jobs due to reservation quota system. 2.How many students who got admission in medical , engg.., IITs from quota system, actually completed their education and how many were sucessfull. 3.If some candidate got benefit from such quota and later developed,how his kin can be again benefitted from such quota |
10/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3145 |
DOHED/R/2015/63439 |
nil |
Kindly refer to President Secretariats letters (enclosed): (i) I.D. No. 29(4)(i)/2012-CA (II) dated 28.02.2013, and (ii) I.D. No. 29001/2/2014-CA (III) dated 22.09.2014, forwarding my appeals, dated 21.02.2013 and 03.09.2014 respectively. Kindly supply the following information:-- 1. Was the appeal approved by the Honble Minster HRD Kindly provide the date(s) on which the appeal was approved by the Minister HRD Kindly provide the date(s) on which the appeal was vetted / forwarded by the Secretary, Dept. Higher Edu., Min. HRD. 2. Was the appeal sent to the Visitor/Presidents Office Kindly provide the date on which the appeal was dispatched to the Visitor/Presidents Office. Kindly provide a copy each of the covering letter(s), forwarding the appeal to the Visitor/Presidents Office and others, if any 3. Kindly provide a certified copy each of all the file-note sheets, from 28.02.2013 till the day of supplying the information, in respect of the above. |
09/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
DOHED/A/2015/60645 |
This first appeal, under section 19(1) of RTI Act, 2005 I submitted against deemed refusal of the information, sought in RTI application dated 20.07.2015. The CPIOs order dated Oct. 01, 2015 is inappropriate due to the following: I. The CPIOs order stating, ... President Secretariat I.D. No. 29(4)(i)/2012-CA (II) dated 28.02.2013 has not been received by the office of the undersigned and also not found as per available records in the TS-I Section dealing with subject ..., is incorrect as a copy of this letter was disclosed under RTI Act by the same TS-I section. A copy of this letter is enclosed. It could be observed by the notings on this letter that this letter was received on March 04, 2013 in the Ministry, HRD the initials and notings by the concerned officials, namely Additional Secretary (Technical Edu.), Director, Under Secretary are also on this letter. II. The CPIOs order stating, The file on which copy of the letter dated 03.09.2014 forwarded vide President Secretariat ID No. 29001/2/2014-CA (III) dated 22.09.2014 has been dealt with is presently as on date under submission and the file note sheets will be provided on payment of the requisite amount as photo copy charges which will be intimated in due course on receipt of the file, is inappropriate. Since receiving the CPIOs order, I have been repeatedly requesting the CPIO and the concerned officials of the TS-I section, I am not told the amount of photo copying as the file remained under submission so far. The above is deemed refusal of information as it is incumbent upon the CPIO to requisition the file, which is within the Min. HRD either in the same section or with other officials of the Ministry. 2.In view of the above, I submit this FIRST APPEAL under Section 19(1) of RTI Act 2005, and request the First Appellate Authority to kindly direct the concerned CPIO for (i) allowing this applicant/appellant for inspection of all the concerned files, and then (ii) supply of one photo-copy each of all the relevant file note-sheets/documents as sought in my RTI application, dated Sep. 09, 2015, free of charge in accordance with Section 7(6) of RTI Act, 2005. |
20/10/2015 |
View |
nil |
nil |
3146 |
DOHED/R/2015/63440 |
nil |
RTI Application for CPIO (Vigilance), Min[dot] HRD: I, the undersigned, submitted several complaints to CVC/Min[dot] HRD on vigilance matters and misuse of office by the officials of IIT Kharagpur[dot] It is presumed that the complaints were communicated to the Vigilance Wing of Min[dot] HRD[dot] I wish to inspect the relevant files, maintained in Vigilance Wing of the Min[dot] HRD, for the period from Jan[dot] 2011 till the date of inspection[dot] I may kindly be permitted to take photocopies of the selected communications/file note-sheets from the files[dot] I agree to pay the cost of inspection and photocopying as per RTI (Regulation of Fe and Cost) Rules, 2005[dot] The CPIO may kindly inform me the mutually convenient date(s) for inspection, preferably by email (rajeevkumar[dot]cse[at]gmail[dot]com)/telephone (9434747400)[dot] |
09/09/2015 |
nil |
Shri Rajeev Kumar |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3147 |
DOHED/R/2015/63432 |
nil |
We all M.Tech student of BIT sindri having college ID provided by AICTE is 1-466196671.Regarding UGC notification the enhance scholarship for GATE/GPATE qualified student student for M.E/M.Tech/M.Pharma etc decided to increase by 55% on present scholarship(Rs 8000).It is not implemented from 01/12/2014 to 31/07/2015.With the above request we all M.Tech student want to know about our scholarship increment from Rs 8000 to Rs 12400 We want to know that 1. Why not incremented scholarship given to us(Rs 12400). 2. What is the progress on this matter. 3. This benefit had been started in I.I.T and N.I.T but not started in state level engineering college. |
08/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3148 |
DOHED/R/2015/63428 |
nil |
I want to know how the question paper is set for GATE. I want a specific answer which should clear following points, 1. What is the motive behind selecting the questions. Which quality of the student is being checked memory, concepts or aptitude. 2. What is the the criteria behind choosing weightage of different subjects. 3. Is there any specific percentage for numerical answer type questions. 4. Is the difficulty level of different set of question papers for the same branch is maintained same. If yes then how. 5. What is the motive behind introducing virtual calculator. |
08/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3149 |
DOHED/R/2015/80980 |
nil |
Respected Sir/Madam, I am 3rd year undergraduate student of IIT Kharagpur. There have been rumors on quora that you need to have Governors permission to arrest an IIT or IIM graduate. Can you please corroborate the above rumors as they are very misleading to the common masses. Thanking You, Sumedh Mool |
07/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
3150 |
DOHED/R/2015/63420/1 |
nil |
Dear Sir, (1.) Please provide with the following informations relating to examination conducted by JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION for taking admission in IITs , NITs. 1. No of candidates applied , appeared and selected in the JOINT ENTRANCE EXAM for taking admission in IITs and NITs for last 4 years.(2015,2014,2013,2012) (a) No of candidates appeared in terms of BOYS and GIRLS separately belonging to different categories (GENERAL / OBC /SC/ST/PWD) (b) No of candidates SELECTED in IITs and NITs and Taken admission in various IITs and NITs , in terms of BOYS and GIRLS separately belonging to different categories (GENERAL / OBC /SC/ST/PWD) 2. No of selected boys and girls who have taken admission in IITs and NITs and whose parents income is 3 lacs or above and below 1 lac belonging to different categories separately. 3. No of all boys and girls whose parent (PARENTS OCCUPATION) is Government employee ,Private employee, Self employed ,Business man ,Farmer,Pensioners belonging to different categories (a) provided information MUST be for APPLIED, APPEARED ,SELECTED and ADMITTED candidates. 4. The cost of form for the entrance examination is not same for all the years so please provide me with the information regarding the cost of entrance form and the REASONS for the variation in the cost of forms for last 4 years. 5. what was the cost of conducting examination per person and total cost of conducting examination for current year and for preceeding 3 years . 6.How much amount was collected by selling forms in current year and in preceeding last 3 years and how it has been used in current year and in preceeding last 3 years. 7.Do girls pay for the entrance form . if NO then WHY. |
07/09/2015 |
nil |
Reply attached. |
View |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |