Higher Education

Date Format DD/MM/YYYY
S. No. Request No Request Category Request Request Recevied Date Request Doc URL Request Reply Request Reply Doc URL Appeal Registration No Appeal Appeal Recevied Date Appeal Doc URL Appeal Reply Appeal Reply Doc URL
1221 DOHED/R/2017/52773/1 nil I would like to get information pertaining to the following questions with respect to the IIM, IIT colleges under the ministry - (1) How many IIM, IIT colleges under the ministry have Quotas for the Transgender Students. If there are any, how many seats are reserved for them in those colleges. (2) Are the quotas reserved for them always filled or are there instances of the seats reserved for them not been filled due to lack of application from the transgender students. If so, how many such instances have been recorded in those colleges in the past one year i.e. 2016. (3) What is the drop out rate of among the transgender students admitted in those colleges (4) Have there been instances of assault and harassment reported against the Transgender students by the fellow students and faculties in those colleges, If so, what all actions have been taken against the accused in such cases in the past two years i.e. 2015 and 2016. (5) Are there any policies in place to protect the interests of the Transgender Students in the those colleges, If there, please specify what they are ( at least 4 of them ). Thank You 02/08/2017 nil Disposed of your RTI application Vide later No. 16-1/2017(RTI-72)-TS.V View nil nil nil View nil View
1222 DOHED/R/2017/52753/1 nil In the year 2015, with a view to strengthen the IITs/NITs, the council of IITs and NITs enhanced he tuition fee in the Indian Institutes of Technology to INR 2 lakh p.a from INR 90,000. The tuition fees in NITs also enhanced from INR 70,000 to Rs 1.20 lakh per student per annum from academic session 2016-17 with following remission/exemption: a. The Sc/St/PH students shall get complete fee waiver. b. The most economically backward students (whose family income is less than INR 1.00 lakh per annum) shall get full remission of the fee. c. The other economically backward students (whose family income is between INR 1 .00 lakh to INR 5.00 lakh per annum) shall get remission of 2/3rd of the fee. It is requested to kindly provide the impact on Tuition Fee Collection and revenue generation of NITs/IITs due to above exemption and remission of certain category of B Tech Students (new entrance) during the Year 2016-17. 01/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
1223 DOHED/R/2017/52757 nil Ref : OM no. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) GOI dated 6th April 2016 Sub : revision of pension of pre 2006 pensioners- delinking of revised pension from qualifying service of 33 years 1. Action taken for implementation in IIT, Roorkee and other similar institutions. 2. Authority responsible for according approval for implementation of the above OM. 01/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View DOHED/A/2017/60270 Dear Sir/madam On the website of MHRD,DOHED, it is clearly stated at S.No. 19 that ALL admn/technical/financial matters related to IITs are being dealt by US(TS-1 ) Prisca Mathew whereas at S.No.22 Sri R S Solanki US is dealing with matters related to NITs. I repeat, I have requested the information in respects of implementation of OM No. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) GOI dated 6th april 2016 in various IITs NOT NITs especially IIT Roorkee. Secondly I will be grateful if u kindly inform me about the competent authority responsible for implementation of the above OM and the action taken so far for implementation of the above OM To my knowledge some of the institutions lIke IIT Delhi and UGC who are under the admistrative control of MHRD have implementated the above OM for the benefit of pre 2006 pensioners whereas IIT Roorkee ia waiting for necessary instruction from MHRD to implement the above OM Thus the Information provided is not appears to be satisfactory and therefore considered as refusal to access of information. KIndly help me by providing the desired information Regards D C Sharma 18/08/2017 View Reply attached. View
1224 DOHED/R/2017/80775 nil How many directors are posted in Department of School Education and Litreacy under M/o HRD. How many directors are following the Biometric Attendence Rule in MHRD. I s there any relaxation for using BAS for directors in MHRD. kindly provide the list of Directors, those are not following the Biometric Attendece What action has been taken against such defualters. 31/08/2017 nil Reply is attached herewith. View nil nil nil View nil View
1225 DOHED/R/2017/80776 nil A letter was written by Registrar, IIT Roorkee (letter No. Estt. A-21571/E-4790 on dated 21 December 2016 to the Under Secretary TS-I, Dept of Higher Education, MHRD. The letter is enclosed herewith. My query is as follows: 1. When was the letter received in the Ministry 2. What action has been taken so far 3. Is there a well-defined policy to resolve such cases in the Ministry 31/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
1226 DOHED/R/2017/53171 nil 1[dot] All the recorded official comments and justifications and all the relevant documents having a link with decisions taken for the grievance application numbers mentioned below[dot] Also, the related information describing the actions that were taken for addressing the application or the recorded justifications leading to disposal without any action[dot] Would also like to be informed about the Official guideline, regulations & policies based on which decisions were taken[dot] In a simplified sentence, I wish to know the logical flow behind the processing of the grievance readdressal application I made[dot] Thus, requesting for the relevant information in relation to these applications[dot] DSEHE/E/2015/06639 DSEHE/E/2016/05183 DSEHE/E/2017/00397 DSEHE/E/2017/00508 DSEHE/E/2017/06130 DSEHE/E/2017/06204 DSEHE/E/2017/01003 As per best of my knowledge all the applications were forwarded to Registrar IIT Kharagpur[dot] I also wish to know information on how the raised petitions were addressed and what were the actions taken so far, and what is officially recorded information related to these applications is in the purview of Registrar IIT Kharagpur[dot] Based on which conclusions were drawn by the Registrar sir and decisions were made toward the petitions I raised[dot] In a simple sentence, I wish to know what Registrar sir did after receiving my grievance applications[dot] And logical flow behind his conclusions and actions he taken related to the grievances[dot] 2[dot] I would also like to get all the officially recorded information related to the Student protest that occurred on IITKGP in December due to unreasonable hike and alleged corruption charges on HMC IITKGP[dot] Would also like to get the officially recorded information that describes the pretext of this student demonstration of agitation[dot] 3[dot] I would also like to know the whether autonomy of IITKGP makes it immune to Consumer Protection Act violation as per any official record[dot] And Sir / Maam is there any official record with that says IITKGP authority has made mess bill and hostel fees compulsory for every student and IITKGP is fully resident, and it even makes the local students pay hostel and mess bills[dot] 4[dot] Is there any official record of giving IITKGP administration to power (may be by the visitor as mentioned by the Act[dot]) to run a fund called Brotherhood for social welfare purpose that does not fall under the purview of Inst[dot] of Technology Act[dot] End Note: I would prefer to get the information in searchable digital format[dot] In case number of pages are more or to avoid extra payment I would prefer to get the information over my email ID[dot] halder[dot]arpan[at]gmail[dot]com And I would also request to keep my identity confidential even to IITKGP administration if permissible under law[dot] 31/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View DOHED/A/2017/60321 Please find the attached application in PDF file The points raised in the application are: The application was forwarded under Section 6(3) of the act at a delay of 25 days from the date of receipt 31/08/2017. However, the act implicates a maximum delay of 5 days in such forwarding. The official guidelines of processing public grievances relating to MHRD(HE) were sought to understand the logical flow of the processing of my PG portal applications toward MHRD(HE). This was not provided. CPIO IIT Kharagpur not supposed to have it but the CPIO MHRD as per my understanding. I request to be informed on how much time max the CPIO IIT Kharagpur may take to respond to this application. And also want to be informed if CPIO IIT Kharagpur does not respond or the response is not satisfactory what I am supposed to do in such case. 11/10/2017 View Reply attached. View
1227 DOHED/R/2017/53152 nil This is pertain to Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur , Please forward this to CPIO & Asst Registrar Sh Manok Kumar for furnishing information in continuation of letter NO. PIO/99-2017-18/IITK/392 Dated 16.08.2017 Please provide fresh information regarding GATE-2015. 1. Number of SC Male candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 2. Number of ST Male candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 3. Number of General Male candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 4. Number of OBC Male candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 5. Number of all Women candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 6. Total number of candidates Registered in GATE-2015. 7. Application fee for General & OBC Male candidates. 8. Application fee for SC & ST Male candidates. 9. Application fee for women & PH candidates. 10. Total expenditure of GATE-2015. 30/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
1228 DOHED/R/2017/80767 nil RTI application as per PDF file 30/08/2017 nil Disposed of your RTI application vide latter No. 16/03/017-TS.V Dated 17.10.2017 and reply send on your E-mail ID View nil nil nil View nil View
1229 DOHED/R/2017/90054 nil For providing information as may be available 30/08/2017 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
1230 DOHED/R/2017/53145 nil 1) Please provide the names and the nature of contract of all labour contractors engaged by you who are not providing minimum wages to their contract workers. 2) Please provide the name and the nature of contract of all labour contratcors engaged by you who are not providing contract wage slips to their contract workers as required by The Contract Labour (Regulation And Abolition) Act, 1970 and in the format specified in the Act. 29/08/2017 nil Reply is attached. View nil nil nil View nil View

Pages

Last Updated by admin on :- Wednesday, 20 February 2019 - 10:40am