Higher Education

Date Format DD/MM/YYYY
S. No. Request No Request Category Request Request Recevied Date Request Doc URL Request Reply Request Reply Doc URL Appeal Registration No Appeal Appeal Recevied Date Appeal Doc URL Appeal Reply Appeal Reply Doc URL
2101 DOHED/R/2016/80511 nil File attached. 05/05/2016 nil Miscredited View nil nil nil View nil View
2102 DOHED/R/2016/51553 nil 1.why does interview/ written test conducted for m.tech admissions in various I.I.T.s are unorganized as the dates for above in IITs coincides always and students are unable to appear for the same.why such game is being played with the future of students.\n2.why not interview/test is taken at a common place.(admission seeking student have to travel 10-12 iits every year for admission without reimbursement of travel fares which quite uneconomical for a poor background student)\n3.how does the dates of interview/test for m.tech courses in IITs are decides. why dont they decide their date considering the dates of other iits keeping the interest of a student on mind. 04/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
2103 DOHED/R/2016/51547/4 nil Please See attached File\n\nThanks\n\nAwnisha Singh 04/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
2104 DOHED/R/2016/80510 nil To\nPublic Information Officer \nDr. Anathbandhu Patra\nDeputy Registrar\nIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur\nKharagpur 721302\nSubject- Information related to Status of Excess mess money Refund of 2014 Batch (Passing Year) which is with HJB Hall of Residence, IIT Kharagpur under RTI Act 2005.\nSir,\nPlease provide me subject info with respect to following questions:\n\n1. What is the status of money and amount to be refunded\n\n2. when the amount will be refunded (exact date) \n\n2. why did they delay it after so many requests and calls\n\n3. what kind of compensation will be provided for the delay caused\n\nMode of communication for information By Email or By registered post. 04/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
2105 DOHED/R/2016/51555 nil following questions are desired to be answered by IIT delhi:\n\n1.why the interview schedule of m.tech in tribology and m.tech in energy studies is same which is on 18th may2016 at 8:30pm.\n2.why it is not organised considering other departments date also.\n3.how can a person applied for multiple programs at IITD manage to appear for interview on same time and date(sir how can you be so irresponsible its about someones future) 04/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View nil nil nil View nil View
2106 DOHED/R/2016/51547/2 nil Please See attached File\n\nThanks\n\nAwnisha Singh 04/05/2016 nil The information sought by the applicant is not available in records held under my control. View nil nil nil View nil View
2107 DOHED/R/2016/51558 nil To\n The Public Information Officer Date: 04.05.2016\n Dept. of Higher Education \n MHRD, New Delhi\n\nSubject: Regarding following information under RTI Act-2005\n\nDear Sir,\n I request you to kindly provide the below mentioned information under RTI.\n\n1) Plz provide the copy of letter/instructions received by MHRD from CVC regarding the undersigned with respect to the undertaking sent to CVC vide no. Conf/6496/16-304322 dt. 12.01.2016 as per the requirement of CVC seeking protection under PIDPI.\n\nPlease send authenticate copy of the reply.\n\n Thanking you,\n Sincerely,\n \n Dr. Saroj Ranjan De\n Citizen of India 04/05/2016 nil Information provided vide OM No. C-21011/29/2016-Vig dated 02.06.2016. View nil nil nil View nil View
2108 DOHED/R/2016/51538 nil To\n Public Information Officer\n Ministry of Human Resources Development \n New Delhi\n\nSub: Information under Right to information Act.\nSir/Madam\n You are requested to supply the following information under Right to Information Act. Payment has been made through online gateway. \n\nIf any faculty/guide quits the institute (IIT) due to any reason and a student who have put his/her two or three of research as PhD student, as per rules of IIT, a student is asked to choose another guide and start afresh on the new topic. Whereas if the guide from West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS) quits, then as per Rule 4.2 of West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS) REGULATIONS GOVERNING AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, the guide is bound to make an agreement that he will have the responsibility of continuing to guide the students who are registered under him/her before getting relieved from the university. The exact wording of the rule 4.2 is reproduced below.\n\n4.2 Faculty who attain superannuation or resign their jobs will forfeit recognition as Guide / Coguide. However, such a person shall sign a letter that he/ she shall have the responsibility of continuing to guide candidates who were registered under him / her, before getting relieved from the University \n\nIn the first case relating to IIT the time spent by the student is wasted and no safeguards are provided by the IIT to continue his work on the old topic/subject, instead the student is asked to start afresh on a fresh topic/subject, while in the second case, the rule has been made taking in to consideration the future as well the rights of the student.\n\n Please clarify why there is a disparity in rules of the two institutions whereas both the institutions are governed by your department. \n\n We also want to ask if in such a situation, you (MHRD) is/are willing to force IIT to bound its teacher to guide the students till their thesis gets completed.\n\n We ask whether in such a case MHRD will pay for the additional years (6th and 7th) spent in completing the thesis as compared to normal five years span for which scholarship is paid as according to IIT, student has to start afresh with new topic of Ph.D.\n\nThanking you\nYours faithfully\n\nRavinder Kumar Ajmani\nHouse No. 1394\nSector 7 \nKarnal 132001 \nHaryana 04/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View DOHED/A/2016/60173 To\nMinistry of Human Resources Development \nNew Delhi\n\nSub: Information under Right to information Act.\nSir/Madam\nYou are requested to supply the following information under Right to Information Act. Payment has been made through online gateway. \n\nIf any faculty/guide quits the institute (IIT) due to any reason and a student who have put his/her two or three of research as PhD student, as per rules of IIT, a student is asked to choose another guide and start afresh on the new topic. Whereas if the guide from West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS) quits, then as per Rule 4.2 of West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS) REGULATIONS GOVERNING AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, the guide is bound to make an agreement that he will have the responsibility of continuing to guide the students who are registered under him/her before getting relieved from the university. The exact wording of the rule 4.2 is reproduced below.\n\n4.2 Faculty who attain superannuation or resign their jobs will forfeit recognition as Guide / Coguide. However, such a person shall sign a letter that he/ she shall have the responsibility of continuing to guide candidates who were registered under him / her, before getting relieved from the University \n\nIn the first case relating to IIT the time spent by the student is wasted and no safeguards are provided by the IIT to continue his work on the old topic/subject, instead the student is asked to start afresh on a fresh topic/subject, while in the second case, the rule has been made taking in to consideration the future as well the rights of the student.\n\nPlease clarify why there is a disparity in rules of the two institutions whereas both the institutions are governed by your department. \n\nWe also want to ask if in such a situation, you (MHRD) is/are willing to force IIT to bound its teacher to guide the students till their thesis gets completed.\n\nWe ask whether in such a case MHRD will pay for the additional years (6th and 7th) spent in completing the thesis as compared to normal five years span for which scholarship is paid as according to IIT, student has to start afresh with new topic of Ph.d\n\n\nI had earlier asked the above written matter to RTI officer but unsatisfactory reply came. As IIT comes under the control of MHRD, it becomes your responsibility to furnish the above said information. Please furnish the information in case of IIT as MHRD is the boss of IITs. In case of comparison of the above information with that of WBNUJS if it does not come under your supervision, we will accept it. But saying that this matter belongs to IIT will not work. IIT does not have information or rule for the above written situation, in this case student has no option other than to approach MHRD. So, kindly consider the case sincerely as this problem is not hypothetical but real. Suggest or furnish good information cum solution to this problem\n\nRavinder Ajmani 10/05/2016 View Reply attached. View
2109 DOHED/R/2016/51533 nil Application attached 03/05/2016 nil Disposed of your RTI application vide latter No. 16-7/2016(RTI-173) dated 17.05.2016 View nil nil nil View nil View
2110 DOHED/R/2016/51520 nil Sir\nWhat is the basis for giving project extensions to the final year MTech students in Indian Institute of Technology Madras How can you quantify this for example if a students performance is below a particular grade I would like to know if the project extension facility is given to a student under any specific rule or guidelines Kindly provide me with the information\nThank you\nRegards\nJayachandra Y 03/05/2016 nil Reply attached. View DOHED/A/2016/60221 Sir,\n\nIt was said that the RTI application had been transferred to Mrs. V.G. Bhooma, IRPS, PIO & Registrar, IIT Madras for furnishing the required information but still nothing has been informed yet regarding the matter\n\n 05/06/2016 View Reply attached. View

Pages

Last Updated by admin on :- Tuesday, 19 February 2019 - 5:13pm